

Full description not available








C**B
Outstanding
The book is excellent in its scope, conception, and style. It is--as is not unusual--much better than the film. While dense, and hence takes days rather than hours to read, it is riveting. Take the time. This book is well worth it.
K**G
Worth reading this
This is a long book, heavy going in parts, but it will tell you all about the man, how he developed the weapon and how he felt about it afterwards. A great read.
K**N
A hard but excellent read
No doubt, like me, many of you reading this will be looking at this due to the Oppenheimer film, which got most of its information from this. Is it worth the read? Yes, but it isn't an easy one. God knows how much work and effort went into making this account. It is heavy yet fascinating reading, especially about the father of the nuclear bomb. It is in many ways a telling of his entire life story. Well written. Would very much recommend this.
W**T
A Revelation! The evolution of Quantum Mechanics. Life in Los Alamos. The bomb. The blowback.
This is the first complete account of the life of Oppenheimer, the bomb, the nature of his genius and the failure of those in control to understand his deeper moral insight. Right now, the same test faces the millions of Americans: half of whom believe Trump's idiotic beliefs without a scrap of evidence. Why? Because of a defective education system. It does not produce people who are able to see through the lies told by vested interests.This book is riveting. We get a very clear idea of Oppie, the immense power of mind he had which even developed fresh gifts under the pressure to build the bomb before the Nazis. His gift of handling everybody he dealt with: astonishing this is. The stupidity of those in control, like Eisenhower. The US military are not equipped. When did they ever not mess up?The two authors have given a very precise account of everything that matters, maybe too much at times, for we do not need it all. Alas, the 700 pp of the paperback are printed so close to the spine that it spoils the read. It cannot be read. See pp 64,66.William W.C. Scott
T**D
A must read for all of us
One of best documentary- biography book of our time and the most vital issues of our world today, nuclear weapons and very real danger of nuclear war. The book also nicely pictures the society, both the Jewish community ofvthe time in US, which is totally different than today, and scientific community, as well as the horror of Mccarthism in US, which strongly resembles some of the trends which we see today. The book is excellently written and must read for all of us.
A**N
Insightful and sad as well as interesting
Brilliant book which provided a fascinating insight into the world of Oppenheimer and the development of the atomic bomb.
D**T
How to read english
Fascinating
A**H
Oppenheimer's opposites
Arguably the ‘tell’ in this admirable and epic inquiry into the enigma that was Robert Oppenheimer comes early. “My life as a child did not prepare me for the fact that the world is full of cruel and bitter things”, he reminisces, and his sheltered home life offered him “no healthy way to be a bastard." If only the boy ‘Oppie' had got more dirt under his finger nails and learned to be that ‘bastard’! Then he might have foreseen the high probability that his delivery of the first atomic bomb would open a Pandora’s Box to the scary but so far futile nuclear arms race we’ve survived these last near 80 years. And then he might have been prepared for, or at least grown a thicker skin against the character assassination that almost tarnished his entire reputation. For no less brilliant Los Alamos amigos like John Von Neumann and Edward Teller ‘got it’. The former partly by applying his game theory to global politics; the latter, well, because he appears to have been pretty much a ‘bastard’.Charitably, it appears Oppie’s real world naivety might be excused in two ways. First, he was as much a man of theory not practice in physics (the opposite of his nemesis Ernest Lawrence) as he was in politics (admiring the ideals of communism despite the mounting evidence of despicable practice in the USSR he can hardly have not known about). He was, if you like, the apocryphal ‘absent minded professor’ (so long as you forget that almost everyone who knew him, including his enemies, rated him as a polymath unique in science). Second, because the boy blinkered by that ‘sheltered home life’ grew into the Brahmin floating above the grubby concerns of mere mortals. There’s a long quote near the end from an essay published about a year after his security ‘trial’ which exposes this other-worldliness, or patronising default position. It’s about “the problem about doing justice to the implicit, the imponderable, and the unknown” in politics and science. Oppenhiemer claims “the means by which it is solved is sometimes called style.” It’s style, he argues, that “makes it possible to act effectively, but not absolutely…it is style which is the deference that action pays to uncertainty; it is above all style through which power defers to reason.” Replace ‘style’ with ‘class’ and I think you’d be nearer the essence of Oppenheimer.Since ‘Oppenheimer: American Prometheus’ was first published in 2005 fears of existential threat have come to dominate our lives perhaps more thoroughly than even the Russian atomic menace during the Cold War. Whether it’s terrorism, distant climate apocalypse, epidemics, the common thread in the response of policy and elites to these ‘unknowns’ has been the so-called ‘precautionary principle’. Ie that attempted prevention at almost any cost is justified. Strange then, from today’s vantage point, how someone as visionary as Oppenheimer never once, it appears, was troubled by the risk that ‘doing nothing’ while the Soviets (in all likelihood) built up their atomic cache might be fatal, literally.And again with hindsight, you might ask whether the McCarthy ‘witch hunts’ of the 1950s, which claimed Oppenheimer as trophy-sized collateral damage, have anything on the cancelling today of anyone evincing a view of history, sociology, the arts, even science which does not adhere to the single acceptable narrative. In his summation, Oppenheimer’s lawyer Garrison might have been surveying the current censorious orthodoxy: the security apparatus was now behaving “like some monolithic kind of machine that will result in the destruction of men of great gifts…America must not devour her own children.” Perhaps it’s this time bomb we have most to fear?
Trustpilot
1 day ago
1 week ago
3 days ago
2 months ago