

🚀 Stay ahead with the Archer BE800 — where speed meets smart security and seamless coverage!
The TP-Link Archer BE800 is a WiFi 7 tri-band router delivering up to 19 Gbps speeds with 8 high-performance antennas and multi-gigabit wired ports (2×10G + 4×2.5G). It supports EasyMesh for whole-home coverage, features an LED screen for real-time stats and customization, and includes advanced security via TP-Link HomeShield and WPA3. Designed for large homes and tech-savvy professionals, it offers flexible VPN support, app and voice control, and future-proof connectivity for the ultimate network experience.












| ASIN | B0C4VZWTM7 |
| Antenna Location | Gaming, Home |
| Antenna Type | Internal |
| Best Sellers Rank | #176 in Computers & Accessories ( See Top 100 in Computers & Accessories ) #15 in Computer Routers |
| Brand | TP-Link |
| Built-In Media | Power Adapter, Quick Installation Guide, RJ45 Ethernet Cable, Wi-Fi 7 Router Archer BE800 |
| Color | Black/Gray |
| Compatible Devices | Gaming Console, Personal Computer, Smart Television, Smartphone, Tablet |
| Connectivity Technology | Wi-Fi |
| Control Method | App, Voice |
| Controller Type | App Control, Voice Control |
| Coverage | Large Home (4+ Bedrooms) |
| Customer Reviews | 4.0 out of 5 stars 2,038 Reviews |
| Data Transfer Rate | 19 Gigabits Per Second |
| Frequency | 6 GHz |
| Frequency Band Class | Tri-Band |
| Global Trade Identification Number | 00840030706974 |
| Is Modem Compatible | Yes |
| Item Dimensions L x W x H | 11.87"L x 10.32"W x 3.78"H |
| Item Type Name | Router |
| Item Weight | 4.78 Pounds |
| LAN Port Bandwidth | 2.5G/10 Gbps |
| Manufacturer | TP-Link |
| Maximum Upstream Data Transfer Rate | 10000 Megabits Per Second |
| Model Name | Archer BE800 |
| Model Number | Archer BE800 |
| Number of Antennas | 8 |
| Number of Ports | 7 |
| Operating System | RouterOS |
| Other Special Features of the Product | Access Point Mode, Guest Mode, QoS, WPS |
| RAM Memory Installed | 2 GB |
| Security Protocol | WPA/WPA2-Enterprise (802.1x), WPA2, WPA3 |
| Special Feature | Access Point Mode, Guest Mode, QoS, WPS |
| UPC | 840030706974 |
| Warranty Description | 2 year manufacturer |
| Wireless Communication Standard | 802.11.be, 802.11ac, 802.11ax, 802.11g, 802.11n |
| Wireless Compability | 802.11.be, 802.11ac, 802.11ax, 802.11g, 802.11n |
D**.
Incredible Mesh Router at Excellent Price
If you are looking for a cost-effective router that will put you ahead of the technology time-line, this is it. I was a LinkSys/Cisco fan and I bought this router to replace a pretty decent LinkSys WRT 3200 ACM. The LinkSys acquired some deficiency in the past year of "half-connecting" to just one device, while perfectly connecting to every other device on its 2.4gz and 5.0gz bands. (Half-connecting allowed some, but not all URLs to load). I recently had replaced a LinkSys extender with a TPLink extender because it could not maintain a persistent connection with the LinkSys (another hint the router was going out) and was pleased with its ability to retain its connection... though it seemed I was frequently fighting over channels with my neighbors which was very annoying, having to change them every other week. After researching the market (I looked at Eero, too), I decided this was the one that was budget friendly and buying a more expensive model was not warranted as I'm not a gamer or an extreme streamer - I have 1gz service from Spectrum anyway. I did look for a router that supported USB as I have a couple of USB drives (12gb) for "cloud" storage of my files. This router comes with "Easy Mesh" which I did not pay that much attention to, since the new TpLink extender was doing a nice job (Yes, the two extra SSIDs were a little annoying when connecting devices, but I was OK with that). Setup was pretty easy, though I did want to get into the configuration to set fixed IP addresses for wired and non-wired devices in my home. All that worked perfectly fine. The only irritation I had was LinkSys uses the Gateway of 192.168.1.1 and TpLink chose 192.168.0.1. So all my fixed IP address devices had to be reconfigured (I have a WD Cloud and Canon and Samsung printers)... all of which were time-consuming to figure out how to get them reconnected to the BE9300. Then came the big surprise! I went into the setup on the TPLink "extender" and the BE9300 recognized it and "hijacked" it! The extender is no longer an extender (though it can be configured as one), but it turned out to be a mesh access point. All of a sudden, the 2.4gz and 5.0gz networks on the extender (TPLink RE550) were greyed-out! The BE9300 turned it into a mesh access point! Being a little skeptical, I cranked up m favorite WiFi phone app (WiFi Overview) and walked thru the house (3600sf). This app displays a graphical indication of signal strength in a parabola display of all SSIDs nearby. Since the extender was now a mesh access point, I only had TWO SSIDS (one for 2.4 and one for 5.0) and of course, two "sub" SSIDs. As I walked further away from the BE9300, I could see the signal strength of the mesh unit growing larger and larger. Like any mesh network, it apparently switched to the mesh access point seamlessly on my phone... as advertised without any degradation of visual download speed.. Additionally, a lot of reviews on this product indicated they were seeing increases in download speed, so I did quite a few speed tests with several different test sites. Since my Spectrum 1gz service is still copper, I knew I'd never see 1gz speed, but the top speed with the LinkSys on and off the wire was about 910gz-920gz... not quite a 10% "loss", but still respectable. With the BE9300, I am consistently seeing over 950gz, so yes, I'll agree there is a slight increase in download speed. Another plus here is the BE9300 is Wifi 7 enabled. Yes, currently, the only WiFi device is the iPhone 17 pro, but again, its nice to be ahead of the technology curve rather than be current or behind it. In summary, I have to admit, the BE9300 exceeded my expectations, as I was not really in the market for a mesh system, but almost, by accident, I have one (I glossed over the "Easy Mesh" part of the BE9300). Combined with the slight increase in speed and the WiFi 7 capability already being there, I highly recommend this guy if you want to stay in the $200 range (vs. $400 range) when looking at a new or replacement router. And I got this during Amazon's fall "sale" and it happened to have a $20 coupon from TpLink which made it a very nice deal.
B**E
I don't know what's up with the subpar ratings, but read this review, you need it
I'm a 37 year old computer scientist that has breathed computers, internet, and all its assorted devices his whole life. TP-Link is a standout router company right now, probably due to relative under-performance in the medium term. But their current Wifi 7 routers are unmatched; it's not even a debate. This is the best router you can get for the money right now, and with Wifi 7 bringing the MLO network, your wifi will have never been better (once you have devices that also support it, with the most important one being your smartphone (Samsung's newest as of writing already has Wifi 7 support, with iPhone 16 pro rumored to be getting it. If you have both of these, you need to turn on the MLO network setting in your router. It is absolutely worth paying for to have it done if you don't have the slightest clue how). The app is also very easy and very pleasant to use, with a modern UX that today's consumer demands. It can also help you set up your router, including said MLO network. Don't forget to enable EasyMesh, too, if applicable. And speaking of EasyMesh - do you need a new router? If that's the question you have for yourself, I'd say that if it's not Wifi 7 (and it almost definitely isn't, or you wouldn't be here) at the very least, then you do. But there's another metric with a lower bar: go into your router settings and update its firmware right now. If it doesn't support EasyMesh after that firmware update, yeah, you should upgrade. EasyMesh is the Wifi Alliance's new standard Mesh system that will support a mesh network not just between different models of routers, but different companies. That's huge. This, along with the MLO network, means that these modern routers are a very large step-change in technology, quite possibly the largest since 5Ghz and the advent of WPA2 encryption, and these were ages ago. Bonus MLO network section: Why is the MLO network a big deal for your smartphone? At a glance, it seems to just combine all the bands (2.4, 5, and 6Ghz) into one. So that just means higher throughput, right? Isn't 5Ghz enough even for HDR 4k video on Netflix? Yes, it is. But while greater throughput is nice, think about it for a second. Right now, any Wifi network you connect to (meaning a singular named SSID) only supports one band. So if you're connected to 5Ghz, and then you go outside into your backyard, you have to depend on your phone to be smart enough to switch to the 2.4Ghz to maintain a connection (since higher Ghz don't travel as far). This often fails. What's worse, even if it does switch, the phone often never sees the use in switching BACK to 5Ghz when you go back in the house, so you will be connected to the slower band potentially indefinitely, unless you go change the Wifi you're connected to manually. And you'd have to do this every. single. time. Why even have all these nice bands with specific purposes if it's so annoying to use? Well, here comes the MLO network to save the day. If all the bands can simply always be active on just one Wifi network, there's never a choice to make in the first place: not for you, NOR your phone. You're just always using all them. That means when you go into your backyard, your phone will simply be unable to use 5Ghz only because it's too far away, but the MLO will still be sending packets on 2.4Ghz. And when you go back inside, there doesn't need to be any intelligent decision by you nor the phone, since it's still on the same network, and once you're back in physical range, the 5Ghz will just start sending again right away. No user input needed, and no stupid algorithms making bad choices. And, it works with 6ghz too, of course. All 3 bands at the same time, on the same SSID. Do you see what I'm getting at now? It's a huge step forward for both performance AND ease of use. Wifi 7's MLO network, along with the Wifi Alliance's EasyMesh standard will usher in a new era of Home Wifi performance, reliability and user experience, with the long-term goal of single band Wifi SSID's disappearing completely and MLO network SSID's being the norm. But don't get too excited - devices have to support Wifi 7 to see the MLO network. So for now, your phone will be one of the only devices to use it. But honestly, that's good enough for now - the tech is that transformative. But one day, your toaster, fridge and Hue lighting system will simply connect to the one MLO network that exists, and no other single-band Wifi's will even be on, because they will no longer have a use outside of legacy devices that some people just can't live without.
R**S
MLO does not work in mesh (makes tri-band useless)
This is very close to scam model features advertisement. Reason i bought these routers is that my older mesh setup from same vendor (3x Deco M9 and 2x Deco M5 nodes) stopped working two months ago after firmware update - they broke DHCP for Guest network where i keep 50 IOT devices isolated from main network. Which was already a firm suggestion to not use this brand any more. Why I decided to give them a try again, I don’t know.. OK I received two BE550 today and spent entire morning to bind them in mesh (kinda glitchy process, had to reset them multiple times and login to local web UI, of course I updated FW to latest). Neither web UI nor Tether iphone app show backend eth links speed, but at least 1G eth should work for my test (i think it’s less than 100ft of Cat5e cable and worked well earlier) as my Comcast uplink is only 600Mbits, far from extreme requirements right? So again, my setup is wired backend between wifi nodes, and I need full speed of all 3 bands combined with dynamic allocation - wherever I go in my house, I want the top speed from these best customer level WiFi 7 devices! And here we start to struggle with TP-Link: 1) main wifi network can only combine 2.4 + 5Ghz, 6Ghz is separate band. Its basically old 802.1ac where your devices switch between old slow 2.4 and faster but not stable 5 bands. 2) MLO (multi link operation) - which is essential for tri-band - can only be enabled as separate wifi network (SSID) and(!) only combine 5 + 6 GHz, meaning that you always have to be pretty close to routers. 3) MLO (surprise!) appears to be working only off main node, and latest firmware does not support it for mesh satellite nodes. This is official and clear statement from their support line today!! Moreover they told me BE63 model (specialised mesh model) also has this problem! To make it clear for you - new 6GHz band alone makes zero sense if you stick to it, unless you live in studio apartment and router is in the middle. And only way to use third band in BE550 is dedicated 6GHz SSID. Meaning that either you need 8 nodes across the house, or you will have poor reception all the time going from couch to kitchen. I’m going to return these and try Asus tri-band Wifi 7. TP links are just too basic for the price, and I don’t want to rely on it any more.
R**J
2024/2025 is the Year of WiFi 7
Review Update August 31, 2025: In recent months Apple has updated the iPhone 16 to use MLO [Multi-Link Operation] efficiently. This way, all three bands will be used as needed. When the iPhone 16 first came out in September 2024, there was only the 2.4GHz or 5GHz or 6GHz bands in use on the iPhone. Now, i couldn't be happier that I'm getting full functionality from the BE9300! Original Review August 29, 2024: I wanted to believe the hype for WiFi 7, because I was already in the TP-Link family with WiFi 6 TP-Link AX1800 Router. Installation was simple for me, like the majority of guys on here. However, there is probably a good explanation for why a large number of people have struggled with the BE9300. I cannot speak to that, but I’m sure the reasons are valid. I used the Tether mobile APP, and set the BE9300 up as a new device, using the SSID and password that came with the BE9300. However, I kept all my Tether mobile APP passwords, only updating the Local Network SSID and its password from the new BE9300. You won’t want to reuse Local SSID names and passwords for different routers 🤣. Tether Mobile APP is a powerful tool, use it first if you can. The overall improvement in my home network has affected everything that has a WiFi radio or Ethernet port. For example: I now have very stable connections, greater HDR color depth in streaming video, and deeper bass and more crystalline highs in streaming audio. In a sense, it’s like I have a new audio/video system. Also, my Withings Body+ Smart Scale linked to Apple Health APP, using TP-Link AX1800 router or Spectrum AX6E router, could NEVER display my Apple Health APP daily steps for more than 24-hours at a time, before they would disappear. And resetting the Body+ would be the only way to get the steps back, but only for another resetting cycle. Oddly, daily weather predictions were stable, as were the Body Composition metrics. Just the daily steps were constantly AWOL. Since installing BE9300 in my network, those Apple Health APP daily steps consistently display as intended into the smart scale. All this improvement, and I only have one WiFi 7 device 😂🤣🥲. I have the iPhone 16 Pro Max, which has a WiFi 7 radio. All iPhone 16s utilizes a Broadcom Wi-Fi 7 chip, supporting the full Wi-Fi 7 standard across all 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 6 GHz bands, including Multi-Link Operation (MLO) functionality. Thus, iPhone 16 can enable the full performance of Wi-Fi 7 globally and optimize the potential of both the increasingly accessible 6GHz spectrum and regions with only 5GHz availability, leaving the 2.4GHz spectrum for legacy Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and IoT. All WiFi 7 devices will have this functionality in the BE9300. My main takeaway is that the BE9300, has increased bandwidth to my home network such that all my connected devices get the full signal requested without any throttling at all. Thus, everything is faster, fuller, brighter, clearer and more stable. I have noticed that iPhone 16 Pro Max alternates between 5Ghz and 6Ghz in the BE9300. It makes that decision based on moment-by-moment conditions in my home. Apple will probably tweak future iPhones to use 6Ghz more in the future. My main home theater is a Marantz SR6015 7.2.4 AVR with a 65” LG OLED TV. This system loves BE9300. I feel future-proofed for the foreseeable future, and the $300 cost is an excellent investment.
H**H
Good unit with a couple caveats
This review is for a TP-Link BE9300 WiFi 7 router. I purchased this because my existing router, a TP-Link Archer GX90, was not giving me maximum throughput from my cable modem to my devices, both wired and wireless. My internet connection was a 1.2Gbps connection, but my Archer was only capable of Gigabit speeds in the wired connection. My wireless speeds were even slower, despite the claim of 2+ Gbps on the WiFi 6 channel. Even right next to the router, my WiFi speeds rarely exceeded 900Mbps. The BE9300 didn't disappoint with wired speeds. I saw my 1.2Gbps connection maxed on my PC using Ethernet with the BE9300's 2.5Gbps ports, both WAN and all 4 LAN ports. Wireless I saw the same on my WiFi 7 channels... in the same room. As soon as I left the room my router was in, I saw a significant drop in speed, ESPECIALLY on the WiFi 7 channels. In my bedroom (which is upstairs, which definitely blocks signal on all channels), WiFi 7 usually doesn't even show up on my WiFi list, and when it did the speeds were abysmal. For any of you shopping for a new router, keep in mind that each channel's signal degrades at different rates. 2.4Ghz goes the furthest, but offers slowest speeds. 5Ghz offers more speed, but the further you are away, the faster it degrades. 6Ghz is even worse. If you're looking to upgrade to a WiFi 7 router and have a larger or two-story home, you will likely need mesh-net WiFi or access points that tie into your router. If you're in a smaller, single story home, this unit would likely work for you. I ended up using my BE9300 as my router, with my GX90 as an access point in my living room. I only use the WiFi for my BE9300 for my wireless doorbell, as my GX90 does most of the WiFi heavy lifting. It's more centrally located and gives me reliable speeds pretty much anywhere in the house. With both of these TP-Link units, I suggest turning the feature that combines all your WiFi into a single signal that "chooses the best one", as it never did for me. Both my GX90 and my BE9300 performed poorly with this option turned on. Keeping all the bands separate allows me to stay on the fastest band for my devices and keeps my speeds consistently high. For a small, single story home with the router centrally located, this unit alone would be fantastic paired with Gig+ internet providers. I downgraded it to 4 stars for two reasons. 1st, a feature that doesn't work as intended, which I mentioned earlier that chooses the band but gives your WiFi a single name. Secondly, my router inexplicably died on me out of the blue. I came home one day to no internet... the router was completely dead. TP-Link got me a new one very quickly and gave me a discount on the shipping, and I was able to get a faster option for $10 shipping (would have been more, but I can't recall how much). They sent me a replacement router in 2 days with a return label so I could send the defective unit back. Their customer service keeps this from getting dropped to 3-stars. Kudos TP-Link!
T**T
BE550 is a gentle beast of a router
I wanted its bigger brother with the 10gbe ports but ultimately my ISP is only 2.5gbps (not paying for the 5gbps, it's not worth the cost). If the competing ISP ever rolls out 10gbps then I'd upgrade, but that could be years. 10gbps could be a long while for a lot of people. So unless you have some NAS on your LAN where you can benefit from the faster wired speeds it's just overkill. 2.5gbps worked for me and that meant I could spend half as much on the router. For $269 (on 10% sale) it's honestly hard to find a better router than the BE550. I was a big Asus fan with Merlin firmware flashed on their routers. I was eyeing up their 10gbe router but it's also expensive. The TP-Link Archer BE550 has some negative reviews on the Internet, but I believe they issued a firmware fix...I did not experience any issues at all. Speed tests on wifi? 1.3gbps. Which I never thought I'd see from wifi. Granted I'm standing next to the router, but even from a distance the speeds are terrific. This is much better than my Amplifi and older Asus router 802.11ac. This is probably simply due to the 802.11ax. But the signal is still stronger overall. I picked up a Deco X55 as an AP and may get another, because those have two 2.5gbe ports. If your internet is above 1gbps then you need backhaul faster than a 1gbe port if you're running 802.11ax or higher to get maximum speed (though nothing wrong with 1gbps). I think most people focus on wifi, but I'd really suggest to focus on your wired connections. If you do have more than 1gbps from your ISP this becomes critical. Your choice in routers shrinks. I think the BE550 is a solid choice though. The parental controls seem decent so far. I don't know if it's worth the subscription. The basic features that you get for free provide the basic turn off on demand and/or on a schedule. The YouTube content filter is attractive but it doesn't seem to let you customize it so I have my doubts. The other features of this router seem good. It even has wire guard for a VPN option. It's easy to set up. It's nice looking. So I call it a gentle beast because you don't need to be an expert to set it up and get good performance. It even has wifi7 for whenever things start using that. Most devices in my home doesn't even use 802.11ax yet so to say this router is future proof is an understatement. It'll be years before 802.11ax feels old and since it can reach over 1gbps with ease and most people don't have over 1gbps internet...there's just no point. A router like this will last you years. I'm a nerd here. Very much into programming and computers and networking. I have a rack in my closet and a server in it that I built from used data center parts. So for whatever that's worth, this router gets a recommendation from me.
S**E
Great router/AP! The 10Gbps port runs OK at 2.5Gbps. Web config page IP is in the Tether app.
I bought this TP-Link Archer BE550 Pro to use in Access Point mode, fed by a 2.5 Gbps ethernet cable from my AT&T fiber router. Replaces a decade-old Wi-Fi 5 dual-band Netgear Nighthawk extender/AP to get Wi-Fi 7 Tri-Band. The first big question I had, that nearly prevented me from ordering this one, is that 10Gbps WAN port in back. Is it multi-gig, or is it fixed at 10Gbps? Nowhere on the box or on the webpage says. Even more confusing since other similar TP-Link models have a separate 2.5Gbps WAN/LAN port marked along with three 2.5Gbps LAN ports. Well turns out the answer from TP_Link customer support is yes, the 10 Gbps IS a multi-gig port that specifically will work fine with 2.5 Gbps (and I'm assuming 5Gbps and 1Gbps but I didn't ask) and linked up just fine with my 8 port 2.5Gbps TP-Link ethernet switch. All of this means this Archer BE550 Pro router is future-proof, since I eventually expect to upgrade to 10Gbps throughout the house in a couple of years when the prices come down. This BE550 Pro router comes with a short funky flat ethernet cable with shielded RJ45 connectors that I'm sure must be rated for 10Gbps (but works great at 2.5Gbps, of course). All you need for 2.5 Gbps though is Cat5e or Cat6 (what I'm using in the house) cable. Another hiccup is how to access this router's web setup page, or more specifically, how to find out what IP address it landed at on your network to do that. The Tether app does a great job with initial setup and some of the basic settings, including the ability to switch from router mode to access point mode. But then...anyone who has spent years with routers will say "where are the rest of the settings" and assume the the router will probably come up with a settings web page with more at its IP address. But where? The AT&T router is at 192.168.3.1 (I use a .3 subnet on the publicly un-routable 192.168.x.x for home network) but remember this is in Access Point mode, so the BE500 Pro IP will be somewhere else. Running a IP scanner doesn't really help much, nothing to ID the device, which by default will land in your DHCP IP block (I run both static IP and DHCP blocks). Turns out the answer is in the Tether app. Click on its entry under the first "My Devices" screen, THEN click right on the picture of the router itself on the next screen. That will come up with an info screen and on there will be the Archer BE550 Pro's IP address. Just log into that IP in your browser and use your TP Link website password for the password. You are in! :) The web setup pages do have a pretty extensive list of settings. So far I'm very impressed with this router, in all three bands, and especially the IoT setup. I'm using 2.4 GHz and 5Ghz IoT bands for the solar panels, Ring doorbell, water softener, and remote control of a Mitsubishi mini-split A/C system. The Wi-Fi 7 6Ghz band is working great to a cell phone and an external Tri-band Wi-Fi adapter on a laptop. The Tether app alerts every time a new device has joined one of the networks, which is handy. Recommended!!
K**P
Great for high speed but legacy device might suffer
I'm at a middle road on this product. I have had it for several months now and the general performance has been exceptional... Except the 2.5ghz band. After five months I started seeing connectivity issues with some devices (new devices) on the 2.5 ghz band. This was not an issue for the other bands. I'm questioning the longevity of this unit. I also wish they would start putting some cooling fans even at low speed would help this cool more efficiently.
Trustpilot
3 weeks ago
1 month ago